The following data provides a little insight into the demographic tsunami. I have tried to show this in different ways to illustrate the point.
The first table shows the young and over 65 population age cohorts in 1971 and 2010. In 1971, the median age in Atl. Canada was lower than Alberta.
The second table compares the number of person collecting the child tax benefit compared to those collecting CPP – just between 2000 and 2009 (a relatively short period of time). In Atlantic Canada we are approaching the point where we will have two persons on CPP for every one person collecting CTB.
The third table shows the ratio of CPP recipients to employment income earners – a variation on the dependency ratio theme. In NS, there are four CPP recipients for every 10 employment income earners.
The final chart shows the employment rate. While not shown in the chart, the employment rate among those 55 and up is lower in NS, NB and NL than all other provinces and in most cases by a fairly wide margin.
All the data is based on Statistics Canada tables.
Changing Age Profile 1971 and 2010
NL |
1971 |
2010 |
% Change |
Under 20 |
256,577 |
106,015 |
-59% |
Over 65 |
32,459 |
77,576 |
139% |
Median Age |
20.9 |
43.3 |
107% |
PEI |
1971 |
2010 |
%Change |
Under 20 |
47,206 |
33,270 |
-30% |
Over 65 |
12,404 |
22,230 |
79% |
Median Age |
24.8 |
42.1 |
70% |
NS |
1971 |
2010 |
%Change |
Under 20 |
322,969 |
199,824 |
-38% |
Over 65 |
72,849 |
151,160 |
107% |
Median Age |
25.4 |
42.8 |
69% |
AB |
1971 |
2010 |
%Change |
Under 20 |
685,945 |
922,308 |
34% |
Over 65 |
120,453 |
396,169 |
229% |
Median Age |
24.9 |
35.8 |
44% |
Ratio of those collecting Canada Child Tax Benefit to those collecting Canada Pension Plan (CPP) – CTB recipients per 100 CPP recipients
2000 |
2009 |
% Change |
|
CAN |
75.9 |
65.4 |
-14% |
NL |
84.9 |
53.2 |
-37% |
PEI |
77.0 |
57.2 |
-26% |
NS |
68.6 |
51.3 |
-25% |
NB |
76.4 |
54.9 |
-28% |
Ratio of those collecting CPP to those reporting employment income – CPP recipients per 100 employment income earners
2000 |
2009 |
% Change |
|
CAN |
27.3 |
31.1 |
14% |
NL |
30.2 |
38.8 |
28% |
PEI |
29.4 |
36.9 |
25% |
NS |
33.8 |
40.0 |
18% |
NB |
30.3 |
37.9 |
25% |
Keep the center of consideration on one purchase property at any given time.
By way of example, when beginning choose if you are
intending to purchase flat buildings, office building, business property, or retail spaces.
Each kind of investment is worthy of your undivided attention.
Grasp one kind of purchase at the same time. Mediocre profits from several types of assets aren’t well worth the hard work, but significant income from one type of expenditure is.