Measuring economic activity in NB: A different perspective

There is a core inflation rate as well as a regular inflation rate.  The core inflation rate excludes such things as energy and food which are considered to be highly volatile.

I think New Brunswick needs to apply this thinking to our exports and economic activity measurement.  Every year we get forecasts from economists telling us whether our economy is going to move up or down and usually they will talk about the ‘strength of manufacturing‘ or lack thereof.  But the truth is that the Irving refinery and, secondarily, the few pulp & paper mills so overwhelm the statistics it is hard to get a sense of the ‘core’ economic activity.   Wood, paper and petroleum (basically a handful of firms) make up 76% of the value of all exports from New Brunswick up from 68% before the refinery expansion.  Since wood and paper exports have declined since 2001, this is really about the refinery which has grown from 39% to 64% of the value of total NB exports since 2001.

What this means is that all other exports have remained essentially flat (in total value) over a 10 year period.

I am not underplaying the importance of petroleum or wood/paper.  But it matters if you are thinking about economic impact.  The incremental economic impact from another billion in exports from the Irving refinery is marginal while another billion worth of exports from other manufacturing sectors could generate up to 35,000 more jobs in New Brunswick.  Yes, for fairly labour intensive manufacturing, each billion in exports is said to support some 35,000 jobs.    Forest products manufacturing has a strong employment multiplier.  For every billion in exports, upwards of 10,000 in jobs are supported in New Brunswick.

There are several problems with not having a ‘core’ exports rate.  The first is what I call the Kirk MacDonald problem.  When he was Minister of BNB he bragged of the billion with a ‘b’ increase in exports since his administration had taken office when he knew full well that exports (other than the refinery) were collapsing down by hundreds of millions of dollars worth.  But the newspapers only picked up on the billion with a ‘b’ increase.

The bigger problem is that we don’t get an assessment of other trends in exports that are smaller but maybe much more impactful than an increase/decrease in refined oil exports.  For example, seafood exports are down 7 percent over 10 years and in real dollar terms much greater.  Fishing exports have dropped by 34% and aquaculture down 14%.  Is the fishing industry in a state of decline or has it bottomed out?

We have seen fairly strong growth in mining exports (potash for one) but is this expected ton increase or decrease over the next decade?  What does the steep drop in electricity exports mean?

You get my point.  The refinery and a few forest products mills crowd out discussion about serious economic trends in other sectors.

10 Year % Change in Exports

32411 – Petroleum Refineries 149%

32211 – Pulp Mills 26%
31171 – Seafood Product Preparation and Packaging -7%
21111 – Oil and Gas Extraction 4540%
32212 – Paper Mills -53%
21239 – Other Non-Metallic Mineral Mining and Quarrying 111%
32111 – Sawmills and Wood Preservation -57%
21223 – Copper, Nickel, Lead and Zinc Ore Mining 27%
33149 – Non-Ferrous Metal Rolling, Drawing, Extruding and Alloying 240%
31141 – Frozen Food Manufacturing 2%
33999 – All Other Miscellaneous Manufacturing 349%
11251 – Animal Aquaculture -14%
22111 – Electric Power Generation -69%
32213 – Paperboard Mills -41%
11411 – Fishing -34%
41811 – Recyclable Metal Wholesaler-Distributors 1220%
31212 – Breweries 46%
11121 – Vegetable and Melon Farming 20%
32121 – Veneer, Plywood and Engineered Wood Product Manufacturing -74%
32221 – Paperboard Container Manufacturing 33%
33699 – Other Transportation Equipment Manufacturing 365%
11142 – Nursery and Floriculture Production -36%
32619 – Other Plastic Product Manufacturing 18%
32518 – Other Basic Inorganic Chemical Manufacturing 45%
32229 – Other Converted Paper Product Manufacturing 107%

3 thoughts on “Measuring economic activity in NB: A different perspective

  1. Good point. The outlook is far from rosy. But I wonder why NBers continue to be subjected to spin like that of Kirk Macdonald? We have a number of economists at our universities, for example. They are paid and funded by taxpayers. Do any of them do any high-quality scholarly work pertinent to this issue? Are any of them taking this kind of data and presenting it to NBers in a readable format? If not, why not?

  2. The answer is there are few places TOO present it. That again points to Irving. Here in Waterloo there is a new magazine called “Exchange” which focuses on the Waterloo region but also on science and business. The internet version comes out every week or so. Every time a new magazine shows up in NB the Irvings buy it or try to put it out of business.

    But to again point fingers-lots of smart guys here with points of view, yet the format hasn’t changed in Moncton from a few guys with blogs. Most of the bloggers don’t even advertise. It takes a LOT of work to ‘get out there’. It takes a lot of salesmanship and chutzpah-something university researchers aren’t exactly known for.

    I’ll take my own share of blame in that, years ago I started a blog which was basically a dumbing down of scientific research from pubmed that focused on NB. There was little in the way of interest, but I also lack the salesmanship and dedication it takes.

  3. “That again points to Irving”

    The Irving media, despite its faults is not the problem. They are starved for content and would happily print readable material prepared by local scholars. The problem is the lack of good material – and that, in this case, is due to a lack of interest on the part of the university staff, the uni administration, and the govt that is funding them.

Comments are closed.